Changes and development of scikit-learn’s developer API
Historically, scikit-learn’s API has been divided into public and private. Public API is intended to be used by users, and private API is used internally in scikit-learn to develop new features and estimators. However, many of those functionalities have become essential to develop scikit-learn estimators by third parties who develop them outside the scikit-learn codebase.
When it comes to our public API, we have very strict and high standards on backward compatibility. The rule of thumb is that no change should cause a change in users’ code unless we warn about it for two release cycles, which means we give users a year time to update their code.
On the other hand, we have no such guarantees or constraints on our private API. This brings an issue to third party developers who would like to use methods used by scikit-learn developers to develop their estimators. Constantly changing private API without prior warning brings certain challenges to third party developers which is not ideal.
As a result, we’ve been working on creating a developer API which would sit somewhere between our public and private API in terms of backward compatibility. That means we intend to try to keep that API stable, and if needed, introduce changes with one release cycle warning.
In the past few releases, we’ve slowly introduced more functionalities under this
umbrella. __sklearn_clone__
and __sklearn_is_fitted__
are two examples.
In the 1.6 release, we focused on the testing infrastructure and estimator tag system. Estimator tags used to be private, and we were not sure about their design. In the 1.6 release, new tags are introduced and using them looks like the following:
from sklearn.base import BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin
class MyEstimator(ClassifierMixin, BaseEstimator):
...
def __sklearn_tags__(self):
tags = super().__sklearn_tags__()
# modify tags here
tags.non_deterministic = True
return tags
The new tags mostly follow the same structure as the old tags, but there are certain
changes to them. The main change is that the old _xfail_checks
is no longer present
in the new tags. That tag was used to tell the common testing tools about the tests
which are known to fail and are to be skipped. That information is now directly passed
to the test functionalities. The old way of skipping a test was the following:
from sklearn.base import BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin
class MyEstimator(ClassifierMixin, BaseEstimator):
...
def _more_tags(self):
return {
"_xfail_checks": {
"check_to_skip_name": "this check is known to fail",
...
}
}
And then when calling check_estimator
or using parametrize_with_checks
with pytest
would automatically ignore those tests for the estimator.
Instead, in this release, you pass that information directly to those methods:
from sklearn.utils.estimator_checks import check_estimator, parametrize_with_checks
CHECKS_EXPECTED_TO_FAIL = {
"check_to_skip_name": "this check is known to fail",
...
}
# Using check_estimator
def test_with_check_estimator():
check_estimator(MyEstimator(), expected_failed_checks=CHECKS_EXPECTED_TO_FAIL)
# Using parametrize_with_checks
@parametrize_with_checks(
[MyEstimator()],
expected_failed_checks=lambda est: CHECKS_EXPECTED_TO_FAIL
)
def test_with_parametrize_with_checks(estimator, check):
check(estimator)
While working on the testing infrastructure, we have also been working on improving our
tests and that means in this release we had a particularly high number of changes in
their names and what they do. The changes will make it easier for developers to fix
issues with their estimators. Note that you can now pass legacy=False
to both
check_estimator
and parametrize_with_checks
to include only strictly API related
tests.
The above changes mean developers need to update their estimators and depending on
what they use, write scikit-learn version specific code to handle supporting multiple
scikit-learn versions. To make that process easier, we’ve worked on a package called
sklearn_compat
. You can either
depend on it as a package dependency, or vendor a single file inside your project. At
the moment this project is in its infancy and might change in the future. But hopefully
it helps developers out there.
If you think there are missing functionalities in the developer API, please let us know and give us feedback on our issue tracker.